Legal Opinion
United States v. Hall
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided May 2, 2002No. 01-0418/AFPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge GIERKE
delivered the opinion of the Court.
A general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of assault consummated by a battery (two specifications) and dereliction of duty, in violation of Articles 128 *433and 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 928 and 892, respectively. Contrary to his pleas, the court-martial, composed of officer and enlisted members, convicted appellant of unlawful distribution of anabolic steroids, in violation of Article 112a, UCMJ, 10 USC § 912a. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for confinement for twelve months and reduction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. WeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. BinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. KreutzerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. HarrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. OthuruCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.