Legal Opinion
Greater Bloomfield Real Estate Co. v. Braun
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 10, 1975No. Docket 18376, 18391PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Maher, J.
Defendant Braun is the owner of property in Bloomfield Hills. Plaintiff Froling sought specific performance on his contract with Braun for the sale of the property. Plaintiff Greater Bloomfield Real Estate Company brought suit for a ten percent broker’s commission it claims was earned by bringing about the contract with Froling. The suits were consolidated and a bench trial was held. Defendant Braun appeals from judgments in favor of each plaintiff.
An employee of Greater Bloomfield, Burton Disner, approached Braun in April of 1971 and inquired about the sale of his property through Greater…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stachnik v. WinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Dassance v. NienhuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hanesworth v. HendricksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Weinburgh v. SaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kingsley Associates, Inc., Cross-Appellee. v. Del-Met, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc. v. SchmidtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Coughlin v. DeanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc. v. SchmidtMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977