Legal Opinion

Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc. v. Schmidt

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1977No. Docket 29598Published

1Opinion of the Court

78 Mich. App. 670 (1977)

261 N.W.2d 540

BURLAND, REISS, MURPHY & MOSHER, INC.

v.

SCHMIDT

Docket No. 29598.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided September 21, 1977.

Honigman, Miller, Schwartz & Cohn (by Peter M. Alter and Patrick T. Duerr), for plaintiff.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (by Carl H. vonEnde), for defendants.

Before: N.J. KAUFMAN, P.J., and V.J. BRENNAN and D.C. RILEY, JJ.

D.C. RILEY, J.

Plaintiff Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc., (hereafter, "Broker"), secured a summary judgment in the lower court directing defendants, (hereafter, "Seller"), to pay $59,200 as a commission from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McKibbin v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Union Oil Co. v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ranke v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API