Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc. v. Schmidt
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.
Plaintiff Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc., (hereafter, "Broker”), secured a summary judgment in the lower court directing defendants, (hereafter, "Seller”), to pay $59,200 as a commission from the sale of certain realty owned by Seller.
The court below rested its decision on an October 15, 1974, contract under which Seller granted Broker "the exclusive right * * * for an unlimited period of time, to find a purchaser” for the property, subject to either party’s right to cancel the contract "by giving 30 days’ prior notice”. Seller further promised Broker that:
"[i]f a purchaser is obtained…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- McKibbin v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
- Union Oil Co. v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ranke v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Miami v. CosgroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Campbell v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Starboard Tack Corp. v. MeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Smiley v. Grand Blanc Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Arthur R. Gollberg v. Bramson Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.