Legal Opinion

Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc. v. Schmidt

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1977No. Docket 29598PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. C. Riley, J.

Plaintiff Burland, Reiss, Murphy & Mosher, Inc., (hereafter, "Broker”), secured a summary judgment in the lower court directing defendants, (hereafter, "Seller”), to pay $59,200 as a commission from the sale of certain realty owned by Seller.

The court below rested its decision on an October 15, 1974, contract under which Seller granted Broker "the exclusive right * * * for an unlimited period of time, to find a purchaser” for the property, subject to either party’s right to cancel the contract "by giving 30 days’ prior notice”. Seller further promised Broker that:

"[i]f a purchaser is obtained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Durant v. StahlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McKibbin v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Union Oil Co. v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Ranke v. Corporation & Securities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. CosgroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Campbell v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Starboard Tack Corp. v. MeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Smiley v. Grand Blanc Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Arthur R. Gollberg v. Bramson Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API