Legal Opinion

Hanesworth v. Hendrickson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1948No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 43,790PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In this suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell real estate plaintiffs as purchasers had decree, and defendants have appealed.

As of October 1, 1945, defendants in writing accepted plaintiffs’ written offer to purchase the property in suit for $10,700. The written offer to purchase provided: “Time is the essence of this agreement.” It also provided for “possession on or before 60 days after date of closing,” which was to be “within 20 days after delivery of the abstract or policy of title insurance.” No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the written agreement or as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mahnk v. BlanchardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. Weinburgh v. SaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Friedman v. WinshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Keller v. Paulos Land Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Kaminski v. Standard Industrial Finance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Karakas v. DostMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API