Legal Opinion
Gore v. Witt
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1957No. Civ. 5394PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The defendant has appealed from a default judgment, and from an order denying his motion to open and vacate the judgment of default and for other proper relief. These appeals have been consolidated and are presented on a clerk’s transcript.
On May 3, 1956, the plaintiff filed a complaint for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien in which he alleged that he was a contractor regularly and actively engaged in the business of leveling land; that in December, 1955, he entered into a contract with the defendant for the removal of trees from a certain 80 acres of land at the agreed price of $400; that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Fraenkel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Martin v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Pickerill v. StrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Kleinke v. City of Ocean CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Nilsson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Bristol Convalescent Hospital v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.