Legal Opinion

Bristol Convalescent Hospital v. Stone

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1968No. Civ. 8768PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.

Defendants Charles C. Stone (Stone) and Mrs. Charles C. Stone (Mrs. Stone) have appealed from a judgment taken against them by default after their failure to answer an amended complaint. In the court below no motion was made for relief from default, which was entered more than six months before the judgment. The Stones engaged new counsel on appeal.

The chief contention of the Stones is that the allegations of the amended complaint add nothing of substance to the original complaint to which they filed an answer, which it is now contended should have sufficed to answer the allegations of the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Gray v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Baird v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Taylor v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Sanford v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. City Bank of San Diego v. RamageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API