Legal Opinion
Karlsen v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 30, 2006No. B186446PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J. *
We issued an alternative writ to address a problem arising from the trial court’s acceptance of a Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 peremptory challenge filed by petitioner after remand from this court directing the trial court to prepare a statement of decision.* 1 We conclude the trial judge erred in accepting the challenge and transferring the matter to a different judge.
FACTS
The underlying action arises out of a commercial transaction between petitioner M. Alfred Karlsen, individually and as a trustee of the M. Alfred Karlsen Professional Corporation Employees’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re William M.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re the Marriage of DittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Butler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Whittington v. McKinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kington v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- AAWestwood v. Liberal Arts 677 etc. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Alafi v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- F.People v. MonierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014