Legal Opinion
United States v. Pollard
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 7, 2001No. CR. A. 86-0207(NHJ)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NORMA HOLLOWAY JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of defendant for resentencing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Upon review of the motion and the government’s response thereto, the Court finds that this motion must be certified by a panel of the appropriate Court of Appeals, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). Accordingly, this Court declines to consider the motion at this time. However, assuming arguendo, that the certification requirements do not apply to defendant, this Court does find that his motion must be dismissed because it falls outside…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Leroy Nolan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Pollard, Jonathan J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PollardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Frank Locascio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.