Legal Opinion
United States v. Pollard
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 12, 2003No. CR.86-2027 TFHPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HOGAN, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Pollard’s Motion for “Reconsideration of the Court’s August 7, 2001 Memorandum Opinion and Judgment, or in the Alternative, for Issuance of a Certificate of Ap-pealability Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)” (“Mot.”). Having carefully considered Judge Johnson’s opinion of August 7, 2001, the numerous filings of both parties, the oral argument heard in open court on September 2, 2003, and the pertinent facts and case law, the Court will deny Mr. Pollard’s motion.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The procedural history in this case is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Slate v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. Pollard, Jonathan J.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Taitz v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.