Legal Opinion

Trenkler v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 16, 2001No. 00-1657PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to address the interaction between two avenues of relief from a federal conviction and sentence: 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which permits a motion to set aside a sentence allegedly imposed in violation of the Constitution or federal law, and Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which permits a motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. In particular, we must decide whether the one-year statute of limitations for § 2255 motions imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Charles Larry Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Trenkler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. CouncilmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  5. Barreto-Barreto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API