Legal Opinion

Leroy Nolan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 18, 2004No. 02-2162PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Leroy Nolan is trying to pursue a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, but he has been blocked at the doorway by the one-year statute of limitations that applies to such motions. He realizes that this is a formidable problem, which he can avoid only if this court is willing to find that the deadline has been equitably tolled in his case. Limitations periods to one side, he would like to show that he received constitutionally ineffective counsel and that he was improperly convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1), in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Castro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Thomas Socha v. Gary BoughtonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Tucker v. KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Lorna Clarke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Jimmie D. Poe, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. TraegerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API