Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1949No. 803PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the offense of driving an automobile in the District of Columbia during the period for which his operator’s permit had been revoked.1 The only assignment of error argued on this appeal is that the attitude of the trial judge prejudiced the jury against the defendant.

Two incidents which occurred during the trial are relied upon in support of this general assignment. The first incident occurred under the following circumstances. Two police officers had testified that they had observed appellant driving the automobile shortly before…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. NiemannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Vasser v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. People v. ModinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Tuttle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Kaliku v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Logan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Packard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API