Legal Opinion
Logan v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 21, 1991No. 89-747, 89-1152PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Chief Judge:
Appellants appeal from their convictions by a jury of distribution of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1988). Only appellant Burgess’ claim that the sentencing judge failed to comply with the requirements of D.C. Code § 23-111 (1989) requires discussion.1
Burgess contends that the sentencing judge failed to follow the proper procedures for enhancing sentence, because the prosecutor filed an information which incorrectly listed the court in which one of the alleged prior convictions had been obtained. Hence,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. HubbardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Norman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Daramy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.