Legal Opinion

People v. Modina

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1905No. Crim. No. 1173PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Defendant was convicted of robbery, and this appeal is from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

The information charged the crime of robbery by means of force and fear. As defined by the Penal Code (sec. 211), robbery is the “felonious taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear.’’ And section 212, following, specifies what may constitute fear as an element in robbery. The court instructed the jury relative to what constitutes robbery, by reading to them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. WelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. CasselmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API