Legal Opinion

Johnson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1988No. 85-707, 85-891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

In these appeals from their convictions 1 by a jury after a ten day trial, appellants assign a number of errors as requiring reversal. They contend that (1) the trial judge erred in communicating ex parte when he directed a witness to return to court and excused a juror, (2) the trial judge erred in denying their motions to dismiss the indictments for violation of the right to an independent grand jury, and (3) the prosecutor improperly used grand jury testimony to impeach a witness without leave of court. They also contend that reversal of their convictions is…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Etheredge v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. MacKabee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Simms v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API