Legal Opinion
Packard v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1950No. 966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
The two appellants ask us to reverse their convictions on a charge of keeping a disorderly house. Code 1940, § 22—2722.
Their first contention is that the arrest warrant was invalid because issued without a showing of probable cause. We have examined the affidavit made by. the arresting officer in applying for the warrant, and we are satisfied that it presented more than enough -facts to establish probable cause. Without repeating the contents of the affidavit in detail, it is sufficient to say that the officer swore that he had kept the apartment of defendants under…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dumbra v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Wabash Ry. Co. v. BridalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Medley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. BoydSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Glover v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Wood v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.