Legal Opinion

Powers v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy., C. J.

The action of the city authorities in effecting such economies as they deemed necessary, and in the manner selected, is fully warranted by chapter 125, Private Laws 1931, if not by chapter 121. 5 R. C. L., 614.

But the plaintiff contends that in reducing the number of employees in “the classified service,”' seniority ought to be observed, and, in the absence of charges preferred, those longest in the service should be retained over their juniors. Notes, 1 Ann. Gas., 292; Ann. Cas. 1913B, 1012.

This practice may prevail under other statutes (5 R. C. L., 614) and in the Federal Civil Service (U.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Person v. . DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Hayes v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Cody v. . Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Umstead v. Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Mears v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Fricke v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Warren v. . MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API