Mears v. . Board of Education
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.
It has been established by the decisions of this Court that mandamus is available against a board of county commissioners, as well as a county board of education, to compel the performance of a ministerial duty obligatory upon the board. But those seeking the writ must have a clear legal right to demand it, and the board must be under a legal obligation to perform the act sought to be required. Rollins v. Rogers, 204 N. C., 308, 168 S. E., 206; John v. Allen, 207 N. C., 520, 177 S. E., 634. The writ will not be issued to enforce an alleged' right which is in doubt. Hayes v. Benton, 193 N. C.,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hayes v. . BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Wilkinson v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Board of Education v. . Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Cody v. . Barrett.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Powers v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harris v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Moody v. Transylvania CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- St. George v. HansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.