Warren v. . Maxwell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The complaint is a model of conciseness and fairness. It was obviously the purpose of the pleader to strip the case of non-essentials and bring the controversy to the real issue — at most a narrow one — -upon facts about which there could be no dispute. But the peculiar nature of the remedy sought, in view of the frank statements in the complaint, renders plaintiffs’ case vulnerable in two aspects: On the question whether they have the right to be heard at all in the attempted relitigation • of a matter already heard by a competent tribunal on the merits; and, if that obstacle is hurdled,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Person v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Belk's Department Store, Inc. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Harris v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- White v. . Comrs. of JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Snow v. North Carolina Board of ArchitectureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Steele v. Locke Cotton Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- In Re Discharge of Burris Ex Rel. City ManagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.