Legal Opinion

United States v. Ciastko

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 10, 1968No. Crim. No. 12251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL *

TIMBERS, Chief Judge.

I

Defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s evidence, pursuant to Rule 29 (a), Fed.R.Crim.P., in this prosecution in which defendant is charged in a one count indictment with failure to submit to induction in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462, raises the issue of the validity of the local board’s induction order of October 12, 1967 in view of defendant’s allegation that the local board did not properly consider his claim as a conscientious objector.

For reasons which I am going to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. David Arthur GeareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. Arno Sascha JakobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Randall Theodore MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. HawleyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API