Legal Opinion

United States v. David Arthur Gearey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 21, 1966No. 30551_1PublishedCited by 155 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge;

The military conflict which now engages the nation has prompted much debate over our system of conscription. This controversy has been manifest not only in Congressional hearings, but also in numerous judicial proceedings in which the draft laws have been challenged. Probably no provisions have been examined more closely than those relating to the deferment of conscientious objectors. 1

David Arthur Gearey was convicted of violating 50 U.S.C.App. § 462(a) 2 because of his refusal to submit to induction as ordered by his Local Selective Service Board. On this appeal, his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Gonzales v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. Richard Secor Corliss, United States of America v. Fred August Heise, United States of America v. Walter HeroldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. Ehlert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. In the Matter of Petition of William D. Scott v. Commanding Officer, Commander Thomas M. Volatile and Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  5. Parrott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API