Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 30, 1953No. 57PublishedCited by 508 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The principal and decisive issue before us is whether there was a basis in fact for denying Dickinson’s claim to a ministerial exemption under § 6 (g) of the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 62 Stat. 611, 50 U. S. C. App. § 456 (g).1 After the selective service authorities denied his claim, Dickinson refused to submit to induction in defiance of his local board’s induction order. For this refusal he was convicted, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California,2 of violating § 12 (a)3 of the Act. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Dickinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  4. Lehr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by508 opinions

  1. Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. McGee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Edna K. TIENIBER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Central of Georgia Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Lonnie Leroy HaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

503 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API