Legal Opinion

Douse v. Meehan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. 2801PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by C. H. Douse against W. J. Meehan. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals..

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action against the defendant to recover a commission. The plaintiff recovered judgment in the district court of Salt Lake County, and the defendant appeals.

In brief, the material undisputed facts are that in March, 1913, the defendant was the owner of an orchard in Cache County, Utah, which he desired to sell for cash, or, if he could not do"that, then to exchange it for other property; that to accomplish his purpose he, on the date aforesaid, placed the property with the plaintiff'for sale or exchange; that the plaintiff was not given the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cone v. KeilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Nation v. HarnessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Votaw v. McKeeverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Frink v. GilbertWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Young v. WhitakerUtah Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Geo. Q. Cannon Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Van Leeuwen v. HuffakerUtah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API