Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Geo. Q. Cannon Ass'n

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1919No. 3230PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. Wm. H. Bramel, Judge. Action by Theo. C. Brooks against George Q. Cannon Association. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.

*305Plaintiff commenced this action in tbe district court for Salt Lake County, November 19, 1915, to recover a commission alleged to be due ber for services, rendered in the procurement of a loan for defendant.

The complaint, in substance, alleges: That in September, 1909, defendant employed the plaintiff to procure for it a loan of $90,000 on defendant’s note secured by a mortgage on certain real estate situate in Salt Lake City, for which services plaintiff was to be paid a commission of two per cent, or $1,800; that in pursuance of the said employment the plaintiff induced and procured the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Butterfield v. Consolidated Fuel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Young v. WhitakerUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Douse v. MeehanUtah Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reed v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Aggeller & Musser Seed Co. v. BloodUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Van Leeuwen v. HuffakerUtah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API