Young v. Whitaker
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. T. JJ. Lewis, Judge. Action by L. H. Young and J. A. Young, partners as Young & Young, against E. A. Whitaker. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action in June, 1909, to recover the sum of $1,262.50 as a commission which they alleged was owing them by the defendant for procuring a purchaser who was able and willing to purchase certain real estate owned by the defendant. After making the necessary allegations of inducement, and that the plaintiffs were duly authorized by the *475defendant to sell certain real property in Salt Lake City, describing it, owned by the defendant, the plaintiffs in their complaint alleged:
‘ ‘ That plaintiffs undertook to sell said property for defendant in accordance with said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beougher v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Hovey & Brown v. AaronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
- Platt v. JohrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Jennings v. TrummerOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Glascock v. VanfleetTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Reed v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Burt v. StringfellowUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Brooks v. Geo. Q. Cannon Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Crandall v. CousinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Douse v. MeehanUtah Supreme Court · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.