Legal Opinion

In Re Toczydlowski

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 2004No. 1 JD 04PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2004, after hearing held on the question of sanctions on June 7, 2004, and after consideration of Memoranda filed by the Judicial Conduct Board and the Respondent, the Court HEREBY IMPOSES a sanction of public reprimand upon the Respondent.

The Court rejects the Board’s recommendation that the Respondent be suspended for one year without pay, or in the alternative, that the Respondent receive a public censure, random drug sampling and continued monitoring (probation) by the Court, and considers the sanction of reprimand to be appropriate. The Court’s…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Matter of MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re CicchettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. In Re TrkulaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. In Re WhitakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re BerryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In re MerloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. In Re SingletaryCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. In re RocaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. In re SegalCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API