In Re Berry
Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge KURTZ.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Judicial Conduct Board (Board) filed a Complaint with this Court on January 5, 2009 in which it charged Judge Willis W. Berry (Respondent) with engaging in conduct which brings the judicial office into disrepute, a violation of Article V, § 18(d)(1) of the Pennsylvania Constitution. The Board then averred that such conduct subjected Respondent to discipline “pursuant to the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Article V, § 17(b) and § 18(d)(1).’”1
On January 14, 2009, Respondent filed an Answer to the Complaint in which the factual…
Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Commonwealth v. DarushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pepsico, Inc., and Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. Honorable Thomas R. McMillen Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In re MerloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BerrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In re EakinCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re MurphyCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.