Jones v. Douglas Aircraft Company
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The question for decision, whether the cross complaint alleges facts sufficient to entitle Douglas, if adjudged liable to plaintiff, to enforce contribution from Boyd & Goforth under G.S. 1-240 as a joint tort-feasor, is to be determined solely on the basis of the pleadings. Evidence offered at the trial in March, 1959, as disclosed by the record on former appeal, is not relevant. Nor may we assume what allegations of the respective parties will be supported by evidence at the next trial.
Plaintiff’s allegations against Douglas are summarized or quoted in the following (our numbering)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Ramsbottom v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Ramsbottom v. . RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Freeman v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weaver v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Petrea v. Ryder Tank Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Flores v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Quenby Corp. v. FRANK H. CONNER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- York v. MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.