Legal Opinion

Flores v. Caldwell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1972No. 7218SC97PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

One of plaintiff’s theories of recovery is that defendant failed to furnish him a safe place to work in that the airplane’s ignition system was faulty and the airplane was defective in other respects.

No evidence was introduced in support of this theory. All of the evidence tended to show that the switch was off, the throttle was closed, and that reasonable steps had been taken to secure the aircraft. Defendant, who testified as an adverse witness for plaintiff, attributed the action of the propeller to compression which had built up in certain cylinders. He stated that when the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Atlantic Ice & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Nance v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Stroud v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Dawson v. JennetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. DrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Miller v. Ruth's of North Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Strickland v. Dri-Spray Division Equipment DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Arnold v. Merchants Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Boyd v. DrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API