Samarin v. GAF Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
The instant matter before this court involves the consolidated appeals of three sets of plaintiffs/appellants in asbestos related actions. Summary judgment was granted to multiple defendants in all three cases. We will first address the issues central to the resolution of all three appeals and then apply our findings to the facts of each particular case.
The general factual and procedural background of the three actions at issue are similar. Appellant Cartwright, Jack Samarin, the deceased husband of appellant Dorothy Samarin, and Earl Byers, the deceased father of appellants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Crouse v. Cyclops IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Rose C. ROTONDO, Executrix of the Estate of Louis J. Rotondo, Deceased, and Rose C. Rotondo, in Her Own Right v. KEENE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.