Legal Opinion

Daughen v. Fox

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1988No. 00939PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

The first issue raised in this appeal is whether a cause of action exists for intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from the death of one’s dog. In this case the appellants, Joseph R. Daughen, Joan Daughen and their minor daughter, Joan Patrice Daughen, commenced an action in trespass and assumpsit against the appellees. Count I was in trespass and alleged that the appellees, Stuart A. Fox, D.V.M., F. Sawires, D.V.M., and Hospital, Inc., trading and doing business as Rau Animal Hospital, who were the defendants below, intentionally or with reckless disregard of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Buczek v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Banyas v. Lower Bucks HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Kim Brown v. Muhlenberg TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. John H. Cox v. Keystone Carbon Company, Richard Reuscher and William ReuscherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Charles Williams v. Michael Guzzardi and Chancellor AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Reardon v. Allegheny CollegeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API