Legal Opinion
Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 1988No. 01212PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
Appellants, Jeffrey Clay and Mary Clay, challenge the dismissal of their claims against appellees, Bjorn J. Gruenwald and Richard Baus. We affirm in part and reverse in part the order of the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas.
The Clays filed this action to recover damages for wrongful discharge, breach of an implied contract of employment and intentional infliction of emotional distress. In their complaint, they alleged that Bjorn Gruenwald had terminated their employment with Advanced Computer Applications, Inc. solely because Mary Clay had rebuffed the sexual advances of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Leroy D. Schoch v. First Fidelity Bancorporation and Industrial Valley Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Creeger Brick & Building Supply Inc. v. Mid-State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Ash v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Scott v. Extracorporeal, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.