Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Churchill

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1947No. L. A. 20041PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiffs were unsuccessful in their action for the alleged wrongful death of their minor child and the personal injuries of plaintiff, Winifred Freeman, the child’s mother. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant, Dale Churchill, the operator of the truck, and pursuant to a direction so to do, in favor of the defendants, C. 0. Sparks and Mundo Engineering Corporation, the alleged employers of Churchill.

The accident occurred in Compton in an area neither residential nor business in character. Atlantic Avenue extends north and south, crossing Olive Street which runs east and west.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Robinson v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Kirk v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Popejoy v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Marsh v. Tilley Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Village Development Co. v. FiliceNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Coffee v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API