Legal Opinion

Bobbroff v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 25, 1953No. 13217_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of violation of Counts 3, 4, 5 and 8 of an indictment. He appeals from the sentence of imprisonment and fine on the conviction on each count. Counts 3, 4 and 5 charge the use of the mails in an offer to dispose of, to three shareholders in a Nevada corporation, Eversharp Launwhiz, Inc., further shares therein by employing a scheme to defraud in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. § 77q(a) (l). 1

Count 8 charged a similar use of the mails in an attempt to sell further shares to another shareholder of Eversharp Launwhiz, Inc. in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  3. Suetter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  5. Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jack Fineberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. Fred G. AmickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Troy v. Post, Jr. v. United States of America, Bill M. Allen v. United States of America, Leroy W. Pickett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Llanos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. David Farrell and Oliver J. Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API