Legal Opinion
Jack Fineberg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1968No. 21286_1PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLUMMER, District Judge:
Appellant was convicted by a jury of mail fraud, using a fictitious name to defraud, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 1341, 1342 and 1343. A timely appeal was taken to this court which has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1291, 1294.
The evidence on which appellant was convicted established a series of transactions involving the purchase and resale of phonograph records extending from about June of 1963 to about August 24, 1964. In the course of these transactions, a number of wholesale record distributing companies were defrauded of substantial sums of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Vincent E. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Jesse James Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Charles A. Johnson, Dennis Lee Lipper, Lawrence Jess Storey, Jr., Jesse Roscoe Storey, Roger Mark Schlager and Brent HarelsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Horton R. PruddenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Carl Joseph Baller, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Orville E. Stifel, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.