Hill v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
Edwin R. Hill, a lawyer, and Jasper F. Anderson, a physician, were convicted of using the mails for the purpose of executing a seheme to defraud, in violation of 18 USCA § 338. The seheme alleged in the indictment was to collect damages from a railroad company in the names of Kierbow and Hunnicutt by falsely representing that on August 14, 1933, they were passengers on one of its trains which was in fact wrecked,* and that they were injured in the wreck. Hill, who alone appeals, contends in support of his assignments of error that the trial court erred' (1) in refusing to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grimm v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Butts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Hunter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hartwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Farley v. HeiningerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Bobbroff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Norton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Glover v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.