Legal Opinion

In re Curtis

California Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1895No. 18401PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. A. P. Gatlin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHabbison, J.

While the respondent held the office of supervisor of the fourth district of the county of Sac'ramento, an accusation was filed against him in the superior court for that county by D. J. McGowan, under the provisions of section 772 of the Penal Code, charging him with collecting illegal fees and neglecting to perform his official duties. To this accusation the respondent filed a demurrer upon various grounds, which Was sustained by the court, and the accuser declining to amend his accusation, the court entered a judgment dismissing the proceeding. From this judgment McGowan has appealed.. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Appeal of S. O. HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Bixler's AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. In re MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. People v. DentonNew York Supreme Court · 1801

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Hanes v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Rowe v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Empire Investment Co. v. MortCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API