Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Barnes

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1932No. 5904PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, J. —

Respondent is county assessor and the individual appellants are county commissioners of Bonneville county. On May 20, 1931, respondent instituted a proceeding against the board of county commissioners alleging that the amount of money which it had allowed him in the budget for his office for 1931 was insufficient and had been exhausted; that certain claims held by employees in his office for services rendered by them had not been paid, but had been disallowed by the board; that it was necessary for his budget allowance to be increased; and that an emergency therefor existed. He…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Taylor v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Irwin v. County of YubaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gibson v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Hampton v. Commissioners of Logan CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1896

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Idaho Press Club, Inc. v. State LegislatureIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Collins v. ParkinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. H. J. McNeel, Inc. v. Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Idaho Gold Dredging Corp. v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bales v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API