Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 28, 2001No. 1746-00PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

The opinion of the Court was delivered

2Per curiam

Appellant was indicted for and convicted of murder. Tex. Penal Code § 19.02(a)(8). The Court of Appeals reversed, finding that appellant’s confession was illegally gained and erroneously admitted into evidence. Jimenez v. State, 28 S.W.3d 702, 706 (Tex.App. Corpus Christi, 2000).

The State filed a petition for discretionary review contending that the Court of *230Appeals erred in failing to apply Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) and in failing to conduct a harm analysis under Rule 44.2(a). Tex.R.App. Proc.

When the Court of Appeals…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Jose Bernardo Jimenez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jimenez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. Jose Bernardo Jimenez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API