Legal Opinion

Jose Bernardo Jimenez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 24, 2000No. 13-98-00465-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice HINOJOSA.

A jury found appellant, Jose Bernardo Jimenez, guilty of the offense of murder, 1 and the trial court assessed his punishment at forty years imprisonment. By twelve points of error, appellant contends: (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to show the truck alleged to have been stolen by appellant had a market value of more than $750.00; (2) the evidence is legally insufficient to prove the felony theft element; (3) the trial court erred in making an affirmative deadly weapon finding; (4) the trial court erred in admitting appellant’s written confession;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Arizona v. RobersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Holloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jimenez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  2. Jimenez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Jose Bernardo Jimenez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API