Legal Opinion
Jimenez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided February 21, 2002No. 13-98-00465-CRPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REMAND
Opinion by Justice FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA.
A jury found appellant, Jose Bernardo Jimenez, guilty of murder, and the trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for forty years. By twelve issues, appellant contends: (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to show the truck alleged to have been stolen by appellant had a market value of more than $750.00; (2) the evidence is legally insufficient to prove the felony theft element; (3) the trial court erred in making an affirmative deadly weapon finding; (4) the trial court erred in admitting appellant’s written confession;…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- King v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- State v. Ordonez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005
- Mark McCourt Lieber, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
- Joseph Alvarez Castro v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.