Estabrook v. American Hoist & Derrick, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The plaintiffs in these four consolidated cases challenge the constitutionality of certain provisions of RSA 281:12, II (Supp. 1983), a part of the workers’ compensation law. That paragraph bars actions for non-intentional torts by an employee or his personal or legal representatives against “any officer, director, agent, servant or employee” of his employer for personal injury, as defined in RSA 281:2, V (Supp. 1983). We hold that this provision is unconstitutional, except when liability would rest on acts performed by a defendant as the alter ego of a corporate employer while performing a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Wright v. Central Du Page Hospital Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- LaBounty v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thompson v. ForestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Estabrook v. WetmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Defoe v. PhillipSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- Smith v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Appeal of BosselaitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.