Legal Opinion

Estabrook v. American Hoist & Derrick, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 15, 1985No. 84-411; No. 84-202; No. 84-310; No. 84-234PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs in these four consolidated cases challenge the constitutionality of certain provisions of RSA 281:12, II (Supp. 1983), a part of the workers’ compensation law. That paragraph bars actions for non-intentional torts by an employee or his personal or legal representatives against “any officer, director, agent, servant or employee” of his employer for personal injury, as defined in RSA 281:2, V (Supp. 1983). We hold that this provision is unconstitutional, except when liability would rest on acts performed by a defendant as the alter ego of a corporate employer while performing a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Wright v. Central Du Page Hospital Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. LaBounty v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ForestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Estabrook v. WetmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Defoe v. PhillipSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  4. Smith v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Appeal of BosselaitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API