Legal Opinion
Appeal of Bosselait
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 8, 1988No. 87-159PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
Two formerly part-time employees bring this appeal under RSA 282-A:67, I, from an order of an appeal tribunal of the department of employment security (DES), which denied them unemployment compensation because they were not “ready, willing and able” to accept and perform full-time work. We affirm.
The plaintiffs, Albert and Edward Bosselait, are brothers, who were 76 and 79 years old, respectively, at the time they filed their claims for benefits. For 22 years they shared a single full-time janitor’s position at the Spaulding Youth Center in Northfield, each of them working four hours a day.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- LeClair v. LeClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Raudonis v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re of AbbottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- In re DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- In re HamelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.