Legal Opinion

Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka County

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 26, 1973No. 43492PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Defendants, Township of Grow and the members of its Town Board (hereafter, collectively, “township”), appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and from a judgment directing the township to issue to plaintiffs a special-use permit to construct a mobile home park on property owned by plaintiffs and situated within the township. The trial court concluded that the township had acted in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner.

Plaintiffs filed their application for a special-use permit on April 17, 1970. The township zoning plan then in existence had been adopted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. ObermeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Alexander v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Inland Construction Co. v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. Berndt v. ItenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Woodhouse v. Bd. of Com'rs of Town of Nags HeadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Almquist v. Town of MarshanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API