Legal Opinion

Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC v. Osage County Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 2016No. Case Number: 113463PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

¶ 1 Mustang Run Wind Project, LLC, (Mustang) filed an application with the Osage County Board of Adjustment for a conditional use permit involving between 9,406 and 9,453 acres of land. Mustang proposed to use the land for placing sixty-eight wind turbines on less than 150 acres and generating electricity. 1 Public meetings on the proposed wind energy facility were held in April and May 2014. The proposed facility is close to another “wind farm” which had obtained a permit three years previously. Mustang’s application included land zoned for agricultural use and was then being used for…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. City of Edmonds v. Oxford House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. OSAGE NATION v. BD. OF COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY and OSAGE NATION v. OSAGE COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. BOYLE v. ASAP ENERGY, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Compsource Mut. Ins. Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
  4. HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  5. COMPSOURCE MUTUAL INSUR. CO. v. STATE ex rel. OKLA. TAX COMM. and OKLA. ASSOC. OF ELECTRIC SELF INSURERS FUND v. STATE OF OKLA. TAX COMM.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API