Long v. Long
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. N. D. Arnot, Judge, presiding. -The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment taken within sixty days .after its rendition.
The respondents’ objections to the consideration of the bill of exceptions are without merit. The proposed bill and the proposed amendments thereto were not delivered to the clerk for the judge within the time required by section 650 of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it appears that they were mailed to the clerk in due time and that they did not reach him because they were lost in transmission through the mail. Upon motion, after due notice as the record recites, the court after-wards made an order relieving…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Fuller v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Caylor v. RoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Paul v. Layne & Bowler Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Easton v. WycoffUtah Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.