Legal Opinion

Caylor v. Roe

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1884No. 11,450PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Erom the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Zollars, C. J. —

Appellee recovered a judgment below for the breach of a marriage contract. The only question made here by appellant is as to the sufficiency of the second and third paragraphs of the complaint, to which a demurrer was overruled.

It is averred in the second paragraph, that, on the 30th day of June, 1882, the parties entered into a contract of marriage,, to be consummated in the following July. The day in July is not named. Following these statements are the further-allegations that at the time of entering into the marriage contract, appellant represented that he was a man…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Fuller v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Hunt v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Wilson v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Balue v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Bennett v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API