Caylor v. Roe
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Randolph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Zollars, C. J. —
Appellee recovered a judgment below for the breach of a marriage contract. The only question made here by appellant is as to the sufficiency of the second and third paragraphs of the complaint, to which a demurrer was overruled.
It is averred in the second paragraph, that, on the 30th day of June, 1882, the parties entered into a contract of marriage,, to be consummated in the following July. The day in July is not named. Following these statements are the further-allegations that at the time of entering into the marriage contract, appellant represented that he was a man…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Fuller v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hunt v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Wilson v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Balue v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Bennett v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.