Rosella v. Paxinos
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant Spiros Paxinos owned and operated a restaurant on the northeast corner of Third and Stevenson streets in San Francisco. He also maintained a stairway leading from the sidewalk on Stevenson street to the basement of the building. This stairway was parallel with the south wall of the building, the entrance thereto being from the west toward Third street. The opening was covered by two iron gratings which were fastened to the sidewalk on the south side of the entrance by means of hinges. When the gratings were raised they were kept upright by means of bars extending…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Meindersee v. MeyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Davis v. California Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- McStay v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Gibson v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Andre v. AllynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.