Legal Opinion

Andre v. Allynn

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1948No. Civ. 13620PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Thebasic question to be determined here is whether abstraction or momentary forgetfulness of a known danger constitutes contributory negligence as a matter of law.

As this is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, such judgment can be supported only if, “disregarding conflicting evidence, and giving to plaintiff’s evidence all the value to which it is legally entitled, indulging in every legitimate inference which may be drawn from that evidence, the result is a determination that there is no evidence of sufficient substantiality to support a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.” (Card v. Boms,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Harbourn v. Katz Drug CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Camp v. J. H. Kirkpatrick Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Hawk v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API